JOHN EEKELAAR, Emeritus Fellow, Pembroke College, Oxford
Section 198 of the Equality Act 2010 abolishes the common law duty of a husband to maintain his wife. What are things coming to? Will husbands see this as a sign that their wives can languish at home with no or meagre provision, while they spend their earnings on themselves alone? Probably not. This legal event, I would think, will have no effect on social behaviour at all. The dynamics of family economics are driven by very different things. Yet the conflation of legal events and social behaviour is common, especially in relation to family behaviour. There is, of course, some relationship between the two. But it is a subtle and complex one and it is likely that the effect of legal events is often exaggerated. This article looks at some of the evidence about these interactions.
To read the rest of this article, see October [2010] Family Law journal (link for online subscribers who have logged in). To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.
__________________________________________________________________
Family Law is the leading practitioner journal, ensuring all family law professionals keep up with the latest developments and their impact on practice. Each issue contains the latest news of legislative change, authoritative case reports, invaluable articles and news items written and compiled by experts for the practising family law professional.
Order by
Newest on top Oldest on top