Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

Five-year-old consulted in child abduction case

Sep 29, 2018, 17:49 PM
Slug : five-year-old-consulted-in-child-abduction-case
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 18, 2010, 06:43 AM
Article ID : 90787

The Court of Appeal has upheld an international child abduction decision by Mrs Justice Black in a case where she consulted the views of a five-year-old girl and her brother, aged eight, on which parent the children would prefer to live with.   

The family, including a younger three-year-old boy who was deemed by the High Court judge to be too young to be consulted, lived in Ireland before their mother removed the children without the father's knowledge and brought them to England. 

Last month, Mrs Justice Black, sitting in the High Court's Family Division, rejected an application by the Irish father for the summary return of the children under the Hague Convention.

When the two older children were interviewed by a Cafcass officer to establish if they had any objections to returning to Ireland, the boy "became very fidgety" and his little sister started to cry.

In her ruling Mrs Justice Black said the Hague Convention "does not stipulate an age below which a child cannot have attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of its views and nor do the authorities".

Mrs Justice Black said the children's apprehension of returning to Ireland was rooted "in their own experiences of family life and their fear of their father" and there was no evidence to support that they had been influenced or put under pressure by their mother.

The Court of Appeal judges, Lord Justice Wilson and Lord Justice Sedley, reserved handing down the court's reasons for the decision to a later date.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from