Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
View all articles
Authors

Five-year-old consulted in child abduction case

Sep 29, 2018, 17:49 PM
Title : Five-year-old consulted in child abduction case
Slug : five-year-old-consulted-in-child-abduction-case
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 18, 2010, 06:43 AM
Article ID : 90787

The Court of Appeal has upheld an international child abduction decision by Mrs Justice Black in a case where she consulted the views of a five-year-old girl and her brother, aged eight, on which parent the children would prefer to live with.   

The family, including a younger three-year-old boy who was deemed by the High Court judge to be too young to be consulted, lived in Ireland before their mother removed the children without the father's knowledge and brought them to England. 

Last month, Mrs Justice Black, sitting in the High Court's Family Division, rejected an application by the Irish father for the summary return of the children under the Hague Convention.

When the two older children were interviewed by a Cafcass officer to establish if they had any objections to returning to Ireland, the boy "became very fidgety" and his little sister started to cry.

In her ruling Mrs Justice Black said the Hague Convention "does not stipulate an age below which a child cannot have attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of its views and nor do the authorities".

Mrs Justice Black said the children's apprehension of returning to Ireland was rooted "in their own experiences of family life and their fear of their father" and there was no evidence to support that they had been influenced or put under pressure by their mother.

The Court of Appeal judges, Lord Justice Wilson and Lord Justice Sedley, reserved handing down the court's reasons for the decision to a later date.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from