Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Financially stricken fund manager tries to renegotiate divorce settlement

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Title : Financially stricken fund manager tries to renegotiate divorce settlement
Slug : financially-stricken-fund-manager-tries-to-renegotiate-divorce-settlement
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 12, 2009, 04:03 AM
Article ID : 89839

A former City fund manager applied to the Court of Appeal yesterday to renegotiate his £9.5 million divorce settlement saying he can no longer afford the payout as a result of the current economic crisis.

The crisis in the financial markets has driven down the value of Bryan Myerson shares in Principle Capital Holdings, where Mr Myerson worked as a fund manager. If successful, the case could lead the way for many more such applications from recession-hit former spouses.

According to Mr Myerson, his former wife, Ingrid, was awarded 43 per cent of the couple's £25.8 million fortune when the divorce settlement was agreed in February last year.

But since February the share price in Mr Myerson's investment company Principle Capital Holding has plummeted from around £2.95 a share to just 27.5p today. According to his lawyers, this leaves Mr Myerson in the position where he is now worth minus £500,000, taking into account his debts and mortgages, instead of receiving £14.6 million from the total assets. As a result, he would have to borrow money to pay his ex-wife if the settlement is upheld.

Mr Myerson has already paid his wife £7million but wants to opt out of the final instalment of £2.5million. He also wants to claw back the house in the couples native South Africa which he is yet to transfer into her name.

However, Mrs Myerson's lawyer, Nicholas Mostyn QC warned that if the appeal succeeds it will cause 'an explosion of litigation with which the courts can ill afford to have to deal with'.

The case was adjourned with judgment deferred for 10 days.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from