Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL REMEDIES: McRoberts v McRoberts [2012] EWHC 2966 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : financial-remedies-mcroberts-v-mcroberts-2012-ewhc-2966-ch
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 5, 2012, 05:50 AM
Article ID : 100807

(Chancery Division, Hildyard J, 1 November 2012)

A consent order was made in 2003 in relation to financial claims following divorce. The order provided for the husband to transfer the matrimonial home and all shares in a specified company to the wife and to pay her a lump sum of £450,000 in a number of instalments. The husband failed to keep up the instalments and he was declared bankrupt.

There was a large deficiency in the bankruptcy and no distributions could be made to unsecured creditors. The wife received nothing and now was owed £350,000 including interest. A year after being declared bankrupt the husband was discharged from bankruptcy. The husband applied to discharge the lump sum order. Section 281(5) of the Insolvency Act 1986 included orders made in financial proceedings as an exclusion from the bankrupt's discharge of debt although they may be discharged at the court's discretion.

In all the circumstances of the case the balance remained in favour of keeping in place the obligation to the wife, there was no sufficient reason to override the default provision. The husband's application was dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from