Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

Feedback for judges in the Family Court

Sep 29, 2018, 22:44 PM
family law, feedback, judges, research, masson, court user surveys
Research by Judith Masson at Bristol University has examined how feedback could be useful to judges when dealing with public law children cases.
Slug : feedback-for-judges-in-the-family-court
Meta Title : Feedback for judges in the Family Court
Meta Keywords : family law, feedback, judges, research, masson, court user surveys
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 7, 2015, 07:10 AM
Article ID : 110569
Research by Judith Masson at Bristol University has examined how feedback could be useful to judges when dealing with public law children cases.

The research team conducted focus groups and interviews with judges and socio-legal and child care researchers, and found that currently judges receive little feedback on their work. As one judge said:

‘[It is] very strange to be doing something every day as part of your time work and not knowing whether it’s doing any good or even, dare I say, is it making things worse? So there is a need for feedback.... I don’t think anyone could logically argue that it’s right to be doing something and not having any idea what the effect is ... you can hope but without feedback you don’t actually know what you’re achieving.’
The research team also assessed practice in other jurisdictions, noting that other countries used a variety of mechanisms to provide different types of feedback to judges.

The study concluded that five potential means of providing feedback for judges are worthy of further consideration:
  1. Feedback through observation and discussion. Judges should observe other judges conducting cases, be observed, discuss their observations and reflect on their own practice
  2. Feedback through Interdisciplinary case discussions. Judges should meet with other professionals for multidisciplinary/multi-agency discussions of closed cases;
  3. Court user surveys. Court user surveys should include court-users’ perspectives on their experience in the court room; judges should discuss and reflect on these findings;
  4. Making better use of existing data and research studies in judicial training; and
  5. Developing new data on the operation court system, for example to include the outcomes by reference to applications and orders, not just timeliness.
A research-based guide on the care system should be provided to all judges to increase their understanding of care services and outcomes, and, children’s care experiences of them.

At the recent Bristol Family Law Session, the question was raised if judges should or do receive feedback. HHJ Stephen Wildblood QC, echoing the findings of this report said, ‘One of things you don’t get as a Judge is feedback. That’s why I am keen to do conferences like this. Open forum encourages Judges to hear what other people think and force us to think more deeply. External feedback is so valuable.’

The full study, The role of Feedback for Judges in the Family Court, can be found here. It includes a useful executive summary with a list of the key findings.

Judith Masson has also written about the research in October’s edition of Family Law, 'Developing judgment: feedback and learning in family justice' is available to online subscribers here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from