Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Family Resolution Research Report

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : family-resolution-research-report
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 20, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85801

The research report following the Family Resolution Pilot Project (FRPP )was published in March 2006. The FRPP ran between September 2004 and August 2005 in Brighton, Inner London and Sunderland. It was designed as a pilot scheme to assist parties involved in court proceedings about contact after separation or divorce. The main aim of the pilot was to help parents to reach an agreement about contact arrangements, and more broadly, to try to improve parental relationships. Domestic violence cases were not eligible for referral. The pilot had to be a voluntary scheme as it was not possible, within existing law, for courts to make compulsory referrals to the project. The scheme incorporated three components: an initial risk assessment at court, parent education groups led by Relate and parent planning meetings with Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) officers. Where appropriate, children could also be involved in the parent planning process. The aims of the study were to identify:

  • what were the outputs and outcomes of the pilot;
  • what, if anything, the pilot added over and above existing interventions;
  • what features of the pilot could, or should, be developed or generalised.


  • The number of referrals to the pilot was low, with only 62 referrals over the course of the year in the three areas. The gross referral rate, including all domestic violence cases, was 15%. The net referral rate, excluding ineligible domestic violence cases, rose to 20% of all applications. The analysis suggests that there was potentially scope to double the number of referrals if referral could have been mandatory. However, even with mandatory referrals, the overall number would remain small as a significant number of cases would have been unsuitable for referral .Only half of the referred cases completed the programme. See May [2006] Fam Law 412 for the full news article.

    Categories :
    • News
    Tags :
    Authors
    Provider :
    Product Bucket :
    Recommend These Products
    Related Articles
    Load more comments
    Comment by from