Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles


Sep 29, 2018, 17:29 PM
Slug : family-proceedings-jurisdiction-p-v-g-2010-ewhc-1311-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 15, 2010, 09:05 AM
Article ID : 91179

(Family Division; Eleanor King J; 30 April 2010)

Following alleged serious violence by the father, the mother left the family home in Scotland with the child and moved to England without his permission. The father issued proceedings in relation to the child in Scotland and, although the mother had received notice of these proceedings, she issued her own proceedings in England.

The English High Court judge made various directions ex parte including a non-molestation order, residence order and prohibited steps order.

The Scottish judge granted the mother's application to stay the Scottish proceedings. At the return date hearing in England, the judge made interim directions by consent for protection of the children and provided for the filing and serving of affidavits in respect of the father's forthcoming application for the stay of the English proceedings. The father's appeal against the Scottish stay was allowed and stay was lifted. The first inter-partes welfare hearing took place in Scotland and an interim contact order was made, which the mother did not comply with.  

Held that the child had been habitually resident in Scotland pursuant to s 41 of the Family Law Act 1986 and the Scottish courts were the proper courts to decide the issues in relation to her welfare. The English court had jurisdiction to make orders in respect of the child only if the immediate exercise of the courts' powers was ‘necessary for her protection'.The child protection and non-molestation orders were to continue until the Scottish courts resumed jurisdiction but otherwise the English proceedings were stayed.


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from