Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles

Family Justice Council dismayed by the LSC's Legal Aid proposals

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Slug : family-justice-council-dismayed-by-the-lsc-s-legal-aid-proposals
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 7, 2009, 06:22 AM
Article ID : 89831

The Family Justice Council has expressed its dismay at the proposals for the funding of legal representation and advocacy in the family justice system that have been set out by the Legal Services Commission consultation paper: Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010.

The Council believes that these proposals would inevitably cause longer delays in the resolution of family cases and an increase in litigants being unable to find lawyers to represent them.

Its response, delivered on Friday, highlights that these "ill-considered" proposals will have an extremely damaging and destructive effect on the Family Justice System, as dedicated and committed lawyers will have little choice but to turn away from publicly funded work. This will make the role of judges harder as less experienced lawyers undertake cases.

The Council challenges the Government for showing "a depressing indifference to the value of quality legal representation and advocacy for those who use the family justice system - from broken marriages, and broken families, and with broken lives".

The Council says it aims to ensure the swift and proper resolution of family cases in the family courts. However, they acknowledge that the system is far from perfect and therefore believe that the proposals in this consultation paper may represent the "straw which breaks the camel's back".

In its broad-ranging criticism of the detailed consultation, the Council states that the proposals, if implemented, "would represent ill-considered administration of public funds."

The Family Justice Council's response echoes that of the Bar Council who have been highlighting the particularly negative impact of the proposals on members of the public from black and minority ethnic communities, and on lawyers from those communities who are most likely to be affected by the fee cuts.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from