Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Family Justice Council dismayed by the LSC's Legal Aid proposals

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Slug : family-justice-council-dismayed-by-the-lsc-s-legal-aid-proposals
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 7, 2009, 06:22 AM
Article ID : 89831

The Family Justice Council has expressed its dismay at the proposals for the funding of legal representation and advocacy in the family justice system that have been set out by the Legal Services Commission consultation paper: Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010.

The Council believes that these proposals would inevitably cause longer delays in the resolution of family cases and an increase in litigants being unable to find lawyers to represent them.

Its response, delivered on Friday, highlights that these "ill-considered" proposals will have an extremely damaging and destructive effect on the Family Justice System, as dedicated and committed lawyers will have little choice but to turn away from publicly funded work. This will make the role of judges harder as less experienced lawyers undertake cases.

The Council challenges the Government for showing "a depressing indifference to the value of quality legal representation and advocacy for those who use the family justice system - from broken marriages, and broken families, and with broken lives".

The Council says it aims to ensure the swift and proper resolution of family cases in the family courts. However, they acknowledge that the system is far from perfect and therefore believe that the proposals in this consultation paper may represent the "straw which breaks the camel's back".

In its broad-ranging criticism of the detailed consultation, the Council states that the proposals, if implemented, "would represent ill-considered administration of public funds."

The Family Justice Council's response echoes that of the Bar Council who have been highlighting the particularly negative impact of the proposals on members of the public from black and minority ethnic communities, and on lawyers from those communities who are most likely to be affected by the fee cuts.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from