Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Family barristers voice concerns over cuts

Sep 29, 2018, 17:26 PM
Slug : family-barristers-voice-concerns-over-cuts
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 20, 2009, 04:24 AM
Article ID : 90051

Government plans to cut legal help for vulnerable families and children have been greeted with concern by family barristers. They claim that the proposals are likely to impact on women trying to secure financial support for themselves and their children from ex-husbands who seek to hide assets.

Moves announced last week by the Ministry of Justice and the Legal Services Commission will reduce the amount of support available to fund specialist advisers.

Lucy Theis QC, Chairman of the Family Law Bar Association, said:

"These cuts are being made against the backdrop of deep public anxiety caused by cases like Baby P. It is in relation to cases such as this that the Government is making cuts in funding. As a result women and children will be put at increased risk.

"These latest reductions will hit vulnerable women hardest. The Government has imposed cuts of up to 55% without any assessment of the impact they will have on vulnerable women or on providers of such specialist representation. Where a wife is seeking financial provision for herself and her children, the consequence of these cuts will be financial hardship. These cuts will result in the inability of wives to secure proper financial provision from a husband determined to hide assets.

"By reducing the support available in this area, the Government is making this area of practice less attractive for prospective barristers. These lawyers will migrate to other areas of law. This will deny vulnerable families and children the effective access to justice they so desperately need."

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from