Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Family agreements after Morgan v Hill and NA v MA

Sep 29, 2018, 17:33 PM
Slug : family-agreements-after-morgan-v-hill-and-na-v-ma
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 24, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88339

David Burrows, Solicitor Advocate. There is a spectrum of circumstances in which an agreement between married couples, civil partners and unmarried parents is of relevance in financial proceedings after relationship breakdown. The critical point for most is the point at which the agreement passes from enforcement between the parties in contract only, to enforcement under a court order and beyond. The value of any agreement or court order is only as great as its effectiveness in terms of enforcement; and agreements and orders between separated couples are no different. Looking at the spectrum of enforceability, David Burrows reviews some cases which act as reminders of the importance of the Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410, (1981) 2 FLR 19 case as a basis for defining the agreement/order fulcrum and assessing the extent to which the court should take into account an agreement between the parties to financial provision proceedings.

The case of NA v MA [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] 1 FLR 1760 concerned the efficacy of a postnuptial agreement in ancillary relief proceedings. The author goes on to look at the issues this raised in terms of enforceability, before considering some further related questions and the operation of the proprietary estoppel principle in this context. For the full article, see September [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from