Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Parents with learning disabilities: the concept of ‘substituted parenting’ and its use in the family court context
Beth Tarleton, Senior Lecturer, University of BristolNadine Tilbury, Policy Officer for the Working Together with Parents Network (wtpn.co.uk) Over recent years, the term ‘substituted...
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, Consultant/Mediator, Anthony Gold SolicitorsA Rebooted Part 3 in force on 29 April 2024 The Part 3 rules have been reworked to make sure non-court dispute resolution ('NCDR') options...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children: record numbers arriving once again in Kent
The Children’s Commissioner has written a blog called "Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children: record numbers arriving once again in Kent".She says: "My unique responsibility as Children’s...
Tips on the efficient use of accountancy experts in family financial proceedings
Roger Isaacs, Milsted Langdon AccountantsIn this article, Roger Isaacs, an experienced forensic accountant and mediator, shares tips on the efficient use of accountancy experts in Family Financial...
View all articles
Authors

Fairness, freedom and foreign elements – marital agreements in England and Wales after Radmacher v Granatino [2011] CFLQ 513

Sep 29, 2018, 18:13 PM
Title : Fairness, freedom and foreign elements – marital agreements in England and Wales after Radmacher v Granatino [2011] CFLQ 513
Slug : fairness-freedom-and-foreign-elements-marital-agreements-in-england-and-wales-after-radmacher-v-granatino-2011-cflq-513
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 18, 2012, 03:11 AM
Article ID : 99147

The Supreme Court's long-awaited decision in Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 FLR 1851 has been criticised by some as a blow against the status and significance of marriage. By contrast, this article argues that the decision strikes a reasonable balance between paternalism and party autonomy and, if applied properly, does not jeopardise the protection of the weaker spouse and the children. Furthermore, it is perfectly in line with developments in Europe (and indeed Western jurisdictions around the world). The remaining uncertainty, criticised by others, is actually necessary, unavoidable and even desirable in an ancillary relief system which generally leaves the financial remedies in case of divorce to the discretion of the courts.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from