Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING/APPEAL: Re A (Fact-Finding Hearing: Appeal) [2013] EWCA Civ 1026

Sep 29, 2018, 21:12 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-appeal-re-a-fact-finding-hearing-appeal-2013-ewca-civ-1026
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 23, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 103367

(Court of Appeal, Rimer, Tomlinson, McFarlane LJJ, 4 July 2013)

A fact-finding hearing in relation to two children, aged two and one, concluded that fractures sustained to the younger child's ribs had not been caused non-accidentally. The judge granted permission to appeal and care orders were made pursuant to s 40 of the Children Act 1989.

The local authority asserted on appeal that the finding the judge made was not one that was open to him on the evidence before the court. The judge had concluded that the medical evidence did not establish as a matter of certainty that the fractures had been non-accidental injuries. While other explanations were very unlikely to be the cause they could be contemplated.

The appeal was dismissed. The judge had clearly identified and applied the law correctly. Striking though the medical evidence was he had carefully reasoned his conclusion that the local authority had not proved the case. He had heard evidence over 5 days and was impressed by the parents. The Court of Appeal had to afford respect to the judge's conclusion unless it was plain that the finding was not one that was open to him.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from