Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING/APPEAL: Re A (Fact-Finding Hearing: Appeal) [2013] EWCA Civ 1026

Sep 29, 2018, 21:12 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-appeal-re-a-fact-finding-hearing-appeal-2013-ewca-civ-1026
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 23, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 103367

(Court of Appeal, Rimer, Tomlinson, McFarlane LJJ, 4 July 2013)

A fact-finding hearing in relation to two children, aged two and one, concluded that fractures sustained to the younger child's ribs had not been caused non-accidentally. The judge granted permission to appeal and care orders were made pursuant to s 40 of the Children Act 1989.

The local authority asserted on appeal that the finding the judge made was not one that was open to him on the evidence before the court. The judge had concluded that the medical evidence did not establish as a matter of certainty that the fractures had been non-accidental injuries. While other explanations were very unlikely to be the cause they could be contemplated.

The appeal was dismissed. The judge had clearly identified and applied the law correctly. Striking though the medical evidence was he had carefully reasoned his conclusion that the local authority had not proved the case. He had heard evidence over 5 days and was impressed by the parents. The Court of Appeal had to afford respect to the judge's conclusion unless it was plain that the finding was not one that was open to him.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from