Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING/APPEAL: Re A (Fact-Finding Hearing: Appeal) [2013] EWCA Civ 1026

Sep 29, 2018, 21:12 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-appeal-re-a-fact-finding-hearing-appeal-2013-ewca-civ-1026
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 23, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 103367

(Court of Appeal, Rimer, Tomlinson, McFarlane LJJ, 4 July 2013)

A fact-finding hearing in relation to two children, aged two and one, concluded that fractures sustained to the younger child's ribs had not been caused non-accidentally. The judge granted permission to appeal and care orders were made pursuant to s 40 of the Children Act 1989.

The local authority asserted on appeal that the finding the judge made was not one that was open to him on the evidence before the court. The judge had concluded that the medical evidence did not establish as a matter of certainty that the fractures had been non-accidental injuries. While other explanations were very unlikely to be the cause they could be contemplated.

The appeal was dismissed. The judge had clearly identified and applied the law correctly. Striking though the medical evidence was he had carefully reasoned his conclusion that the local authority had not proved the case. He had heard evidence over 5 days and was impressed by the parents. The Court of Appeal had to afford respect to the judge's conclusion unless it was plain that the finding was not one that was open to him.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from