Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING:A Local Authority v S and Others [2011] EWHC 3764 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-a-local-authority-v-s-and-others-2011-ewhc-3764-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2012, 02:34 AM
Article ID : 100679

(Family Division, Coleridge J, 15 December 2011)

The Nigerian couple were very eager to have a child and believed the mother was pregnant following her attendance at a fertility clinic in Nigeria but her GP carried out tests and determined she was not. The mother returned to the GP following a further holiday in Nigeria with a baby she claimed to have given birth to. DNA tests revealed neither the mother nor the father were the parents of the baby.

The baby was placed with foster carers and had no contact with the couple for 9 months. The parents submitted that they had been victims of a scam by the fertility clinic which was supported by a newspaper article published in Nigeria describing the practices of so-called 'baby factories' whereby the mother had been tricked into believing she had given birth to this baby.

The judge made findings that the mother had no knowledge of the scam and had been particularly vulnerable due to the death of her first child. He directed that a parenting assessment of the couple take place and that they have indirect contact with the child pending further hearing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from