Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

FACT-FINDING HEARING:A Local Authority v S and Others [2011] EWHC 3764 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : fact-finding-hearing-a-local-authority-v-s-and-others-2011-ewhc-3764-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2012, 02:34 AM
Article ID : 100679

(Family Division, Coleridge J, 15 December 2011)

The Nigerian couple were very eager to have a child and believed the mother was pregnant following her attendance at a fertility clinic in Nigeria but her GP carried out tests and determined she was not. The mother returned to the GP following a further holiday in Nigeria with a baby she claimed to have given birth to. DNA tests revealed neither the mother nor the father were the parents of the baby.

The baby was placed with foster carers and had no contact with the couple for 9 months. The parents submitted that they had been victims of a scam by the fertility clinic which was supported by a newspaper article published in Nigeria describing the practices of so-called 'baby factories' whereby the mother had been tricked into believing she had given birth to this baby.

The judge made findings that the mother had no knowledge of the scam and had been particularly vulnerable due to the death of her first child. He directed that a parenting assessment of the couple take place and that they have indirect contact with the child pending further hearing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from