Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

FA v JR [2018] EWHC 381 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:15 PM
Abduction – Habitual residence – Jurisdiction – Arts 8, 13, BIIA – s 8 Children Act 1989 – Appeal
The father’s appeal from a decision finding that the children were not habitually resident in England and Wales was dismissed.
Slug : fa-v-jr-2018-ewhc-381-fam
Meta Title : FA v JR [2018] EWHC 381 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Abduction – Habitual residence – Jurisdiction – Arts 8, 13, BIIA – s 8 Children Act 1989 – Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 14, 2018, 06:32 AM
Article ID : 116404

(Family Division, Baker J, 28 February 2018)

Abduction – Habitual residence – Jurisdiction – Arts 8, 13, BIIA – s 8 Children Act 1989 – Appeal

The father’s appeal from a decision finding that the children were not habitually resident in England and Wales was dismissed.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: 2017/0118
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 381 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 28 February 2018 

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

IN THE MATTER OF AG AND AB (CHILDREN)
AND IN THE MATTER OF COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) 2201/2003
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FAMILY LAW ACT 1986
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989

Between :

FA
Appellant

- and -

JR
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Edward Devereux QC (who did not appear in the court below) (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the Appellant
Jacqueline Renton (who did not appear in the court below) (instructed by Barlow Robbins) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 24 November 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment


Judgment:
FA v JR [2018] EWHC 381 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Abduction
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from