Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

F v H and another [2017] EWHC 3358 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:02 PM
Private law children – Contact – Long history of emotional abuse by mother – Contact reinstated in reliance of guardian’s recommendation - Appeal
The appeal was allowed and the contact order set aside.
Slug : f-v-h-and-another-2017-ewhc-3358-fam
Meta Title : F v H and another [2017] EWHC 3358 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Long history of emotional abuse by mother – Contact reinstated in reliance of guardian’s recommendation - Appeal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 3, 2018, 11:02 AM
Article ID : 116263

(Family Division, Russell J, 19 December 2017)

Private law children – Contact – Long history of emotional abuse by mother – Contact reinstated in reliance of guardian’s recommendation - Appeal

The appeal was allowed and the contact order set aside.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: 2017/0136
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 3358 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989
AND IN THE MATTER OF A SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF B (A Child) (13th April 2013)
ON APPEAL FROM THE CENTRAL FAMILY COURT
& AN ORDER DATED 9TH AUGUST 2017

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 19/12/2017

Before:


MS JUSTICE RUSSELL


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between:


F
Applicant

- and -

H
1st Respondent

and

B
(by her guardian)
2nd Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judith Murray (instructed by Levison Meltzer Piggott) for the Appellant
Alexander Laing (instructed by direct access) for the 1st Respondent
Barbara Hopkin (solicitor for the child) for the 2nd Respondent
(by her guardian)


Hearing date: 13th November 2017


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment

Judgment: F v H and another [2017] EWHC 3358 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from