Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Expert Evidence in Children Act Proceedings: Improving Practice and Increasing Child Focus

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : expert-evidence-in-children-act-proceedings-improving-practice-and-increasing-child-focus
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 6, 2006, 09:33 AM
Article ID : 88999

Mike Hinchcliffe, Deputy Director CAFCASS Legal and Elizabeth Hall, CAFCASS Manager, North East Region. The article looks mainly at the role of experts in care order applications. The authors look in some detail at possible ideas for change that aim to improve the provision of expert evidence for the family courts and to improve outcomes for children and families. In particular, the authors advocate the development of a relatively standard multi-disciplinary team assessment model. Although both authors have both spent time seconded to the Department for Constitutional Affairs/Department for Education and Skills Child Care Proceedings Review, the views expressed are the authors own and do not represent either the position of the review or of CAFCASS.

Robin Powell's article at March [2006] Fam Law 213 set out the dilemmas around the use of experts from the perspective of the parents, stressing the right of all family members to enjoy a family life. In this article, the authors seek to take the debate a little further, in particular from the perspective of the child or young person. See April [2006] Fam Law 288 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from