Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Excessive costs and J v J: a practitioner response (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:36 PM
family law, J v J [2014] EWHC 3654 (Fam)​, procedural rule changes, legal costs
The recent judgment of Mr Justice Mostyn in the North West of England case ​​J v J [2014] EWHC 3654 (Fam)​ raises some important issues for the family legal profession.
Slug : excessive-costs-and-j-v-j-a-practitioner-response
Meta Title : Excessive costs and J v J: a practitioner response (£)
Meta Keywords : family law, J v J [2014] EWHC 3654 (Fam)​, procedural rule changes, legal costs
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 16, 2015, 05:29 AM
Article ID : 108251
The recent judgment of Mr Justice Mostyn in the North West of England case J v J [2014] EWHC 3654 (Fam) raises some important issues for the family legal profession. There are many matters dealt within the judgment which are reminders and, in this instance, stern reminders of those areas where practice lags behind recent or not so recent procedural rule changes. There are others opined upon by His Lordship which practitioners, including this author, might find hard to accept as valid or an acceptable appraisal of the current approach of practitioners to the court process and their legal costs relationship with their clients. There are other views expressed by Mostyn J which, with respect, some will regard as simply wrong.

The full version of this article appears in the January 2015 issue of Family Law.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or for any offers, please contact a member of our sales team: Tel 0117 918 1555, or email:sales.manager@jordanpublishing.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from