Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Enforced caesarean sanctioned by the Court of Protection

Sep 29, 2018, 18:55 PM
The tabloid newspapers have been awash this week with news of a decision, taken by Mostyn J sitting in the Court of Protection in August last year, to grant permission for an enforced caesarean section in respect of an Italian mother, visiting the UK.
Slug : enforced-caesarean-sanctioned-by-the-court-of-protection
Meta Title : Enforced caesarean sanctioned by the Court of Protection
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 4, 2013, 04:05 AM
Article ID : 104241

This week has seen various media outlets report the news of a decision, taken by Mostyn J sitting in the Court of Protection in August last year, to grant permission for an enforced caesarean section in respect of an Italian mother, visiting the UK.

The mother suffered from bipolar disorder and had been inconsistent in taking medication. She experienced a decline in her mental health during her stay necessitating her detention under s 2 and later s 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983.

Five weeks after her detention, the local authority applied to the Court of Protection for authorisation of the delivery of the child. The child was placed with foster carers under a series of interim care orders while the mother returned to Italy.

Judgment was given by His Honour Judge Newton, sitting in the Chelmsford County Court in February granting final care and placement orders. Reports suggest that the adoption proceedings are now being transferred to the High Court, and assigned to Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division.

This morning we learned that yesterday Essex County Council made an application for a without notice reporting restriction order barring publication of the name and date of birth of the child, the names of the parents and the maternal family and photographs if such publication was likely to lead to the identification of the child.

The President declined the order, finding that, the circumstances were not such as, having regard to s 12(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998, to justify the making of any order unless steps had first been taken by Essex County Council to notify the media of the application. He made clear that he was ready to hear any further application which Essex County Council might wish to make having given notice to the media. No such further application has been made.

In response to the media coverage of the case, Essex County Council issued brief history of the proceedings and a statement asserting that:

'The long term safety and wellbeing of children is always Essex County Council's priority. Adoption is never considered until we have exhausted all other options and is never pursued lightly.'

A transcript of the judgment of Mostyn J is currently being approved and we will publish a full summary as soon as it is available. In the meantime a summary of the judgment of His Honour Judge Newton is available here.    

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from