Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

ENFORCED CAESAREAN/MENTAL CAPACITY: Re AA (Mental Capacity: Enforced Caesarean) [2012] EWHC 4378 (COP)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:55 PM
The Italian mother visited the UK while heavily pregnant. She had a history of mental health difficulties and suffered from bipolar disorder but was inconsistent in taking her medication. While in the UK she experienced a sharp decline in her mental healt
Slug : enforced-caesarean-mental-capacity-re-aa-mental-capacity-enforced-caesarean-2012-ewhc-4378-cop
Meta Title : ENFORCED CAESAREAN/MENTAL CAPACITY: Re AA (Mental Capacity: Enforced Caesarean) [2012] EWHC 4378 (COP)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 10, 2013, 09:14 AM
Article ID : 104283

(Court of Protection, Mostyn J, 23 August 2012)

The Italian mother visited the UK while heavily pregnant. She had a history of mental health difficulties and suffered from bipolar disorder but was inconsistent in taking her medication. While in the UK she experienced a sharp decline in her mental health, necessitating detention under s 2 and later, s 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983.

After 5 weeks' detention the NHS Trust applied to the Court of Protection for a declaration that it would be lawful and in the woman's best interests to deliver the baby via caesarean section. Medical evidence of a consultant obstetrician and the woman's treating psychiatrist was supportive of the application particularly as the mother had undergone two previous elective caesarean sections and that she was at risk of uterine rupture if she had a vaginal delivery.

The case fell squarely within the guidelines of Re MB (Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FLR 426. The interests of the unborn child were of no concern of the court as it had no legal existence until birth. A decision had to be made within the parameters of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

It was accepted by all parties that the mother lacked capacity within the terms of s 2(1) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In circumstances where the mother's medical and mental health best interests would be met by a caesarean being performed in addition to the fact that it would be in her best interests for the child to be born alive and healthy, a declaration was granted.

Given the media interest in the proceedings Mostyn J published a full transcript of the proceedings which included consideration of the local authority plans following the birth. He advised that it would be heavy handed for the police to remove the baby at birth under their protective jurisdiction and rather an application for an interim care order should be made with the mother represented by the Official Solicitor.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from