Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles

‘End of Blame Game’- now the waiting game

Jun 30, 2020, 10:10 AM
Divorce, Divorce Bill
Slug :
Meta Title : ‘End of Blame Game’- now the waiting game
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 28, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

At long last. After the initial lodgement of the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill by the Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP in June 2019 this Bill is to be known as the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act’.

The ‘’Blame game” to end as Divorce Bill receives Royal Assent. It is now official. There will eventually be a No fault divorce system in England.

Resolution members have been campaigning for over three decades to change the archaic divorce system in England and Wales where to divorce you had to show that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to one of five reasons:  Adultery (of the other spouse), Unreasonable behaviour (of the other spouse), two years separation with consent (consent required from the other spouse to divorce), desertion and five years separation.

On the 30th November 2016, lawyers who are members of the organisation ‘Resolution’ including myself, lobbied Parliament and their MP’s to ask for a change in the law. This was not in order to either dilute the institution of marriage or to enable getting a divorce to become much quicker. It was to try to minimise the conflict between couples and to assist them to deal with matters in as non-confrontational way as possible.

The well-publicised case of poor Mrs Owens (Owen v Owen 2018 UKSC41) who had cited in her petition that the irretrievable breakdown of her marriage was due to her spouses’ unreasonable behaviour, had her case and matrimonial matters dragged through the court system only to find that she was not able to get the divorce and the release from her unhappy marriage that she so needed. Perhaps Mrs Owen can now take comfort in the knowledge that her case having highlighted how archaic and unhealthy our divorce system was has assisted us to reach the new reform that will now take place.

The position before The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act

No matter how hard lawyers tried to tone down allegations in a divorce petition to avoid confrontations, animosity and a breakdown in the parties’ communication and negotiations, the petition needed to be ‘proved’ to the court. The Judge needed to be satisfied that the Petitioner wishing to divorce had sufficiently proved in the petition that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to either the other spouses Adultery, Unreasonable behaviour, desertion, the other spouse had consented and the parties lived separate lives for a continuous period of two years separation, or that both parties had been separated for five years and that there was no grave financial hardship shown by the other party if the divorce were to be granted. 

The position post The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act

On the 26th June 2020 the MOJ and the Rt. Hon Robert Buckland QC MP issued a press release to confirm and clarify the position including that:

 ‘The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act will:

  • Replace the current requirement to evidence either a conduct or separation ‘fact’ with the provision of a statement of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage (for the first time, couples can opt to make this a joint statement).
  • Remove the possibility of contesting the decision to divorce, as a statement will be conclusive evidence that the marriage has irretrievably broken down.
  • Introduces a new minimum period of 20 weeks from the start of proceedings to confirmation to the court that a conditional order of divorce may be made, allowing greater opportunity for couples to agree practical arrangements for the future where reconciliation is not possible and divorce is inevitable’.

‘The changes will not come into effect until later next year to allow careful implementation of the necessary changes to court, online and paper processes’.

Is this a dilution of marriage? What will the new law mean for divorcing couples?

This is best summarised by  the Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP who it was reported in the press release on the 26th June 2020 has said:

‘’The institution of marriage will always be upheld, but when divorce cannot be avoided the law should not exacerbate conflict and harm a child’s upbringing’’.

‘’These new laws will stop separating couples having to make needless allegations against one another, and instead help them focus on resolving their issues amicably’’.

‘’By sparing them the need to play the “blame game”, we are removing the antagonism that this creates so families can better move on with their lives’’.

‘The new laws seek to align the divorce law process with the government’s approach elsewhere in family law - encouraging a forward-looking non-confrontational approach wherever possible, thereby reducing conflict and its damaging effect on children in particular.’

Personally, I would have preferred for there to also have been introduced within the new divorce system a requirement that couples attend at least a couple of relationship counselling sessions prior to commencing the divorce proceedings to see what went wrong with the marriage, if there is a spark left that can be reignited and if not, to prepare them for the path ahead just as parties are encouraged to attend Mediation before embarking on issuing financial remedy proceedings

What next?

It now becomes a waiting game to see how quickly the forms can be processed and the new procedure can be implemented. After all, it was not so long ago that the petition for divorce was last amended.

During the Covd-19 pandemic the court system has been challenged and had to be brought into the 21st Century at the speed of lightening with the setting up of remote hearings and the digitalisation process hopefully being accelerated. Would it not be great to be able to pick up the phone to a court and to receive an instantaneous helpful reply to a query? Now that is another question for another time perhaps. For now, we are grateful that hopefully the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act will pave the way for a ‘no pain no drain divorce’ both financially and emotionally.    

The law applicable in this article is that in England and WalesWhile every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this article, it does not constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon as such. The writer does not accept any responsibility for liabilities arising as a result of reliance upon the information given.

Website links

Press release on the 26th June 2020 by the MOJ and the Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP see

Resolution lawyers lobbying Parliament on the 30th November 2016:

Categories :
  • Marriage and Divorce
Tags :
  • Divorce
  • divorce bill
  • Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill
  • Judicial separation
  • law making
  • legislative change
  • no fault divorce
  • parliament
Provider :
Product Bucket : Divorce
Load more comments
Comment by from