Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust v H [2006] UKHL 36

Sep 29, 2018, 17:12 PM
Slug : down-lisburn-health-and-social-services-trust-v-h-2006-ukhl-36
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 25, 2006, 08:40 AM
Article ID : 87419

(House of Lords; Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond and Lord Carswell; 12 June 2006) [2006] FLR (forthcoming)

In a Northern Ireland case, the parents withheld their agreement to adoption, and the authority sought a freeing order. Prospective adopters had not been identified, and the parents required assurances that post-adoption contact would take place. Expert evidence supported post-adoption contact as being in the child's best interests. The court considered that the agreement of the parents should be dispensed with on the ground that it was being unreasonably withheld.

The majority of the House of Lords considered that the freeing order should stand, but Baroness Hale of Richmond delivered a dissenting judgment, expressing the view that that the judge had taken into account irrelevant matters; he should have considered the issue of post adoption contact as an important feature of the case.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from