Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

BANKRUPTCY: Donohoe v Ingram (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Kirkup) [2006] EWHC 282 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:23 PM
Slug : donohoe-v-ingram-trustee-in-bankruptcy-of-kirkup-2006-ewhc-282-ch
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 20, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86355

(Chancery Division; Stuart Isaacs QC sitting as deputy High Court judge, 20 January 2006) [2006] BPIR 417, [2006] FLR (forthcoming)

The trustee in bankruptcy applied for sale of the matrimonial home. The sale was opposed by the bankrupt's partner because of the presence of the couple's four children in the family home which, it was claimed, amounted to 'exceptional' circumstances rebutting the presumption that sale would be ordered.

The appeal against the order for sale was dismissed; the judge had properly concluded that there were no 'exceptional' circumstances in the case. This narrow construction of exceptional circumstances did not involve infringement of the right to respect for family life under Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from