Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE: Sharbatly v Shagroon [2012] EWCA Civ 1507

Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Slug : divorce-sharbatly-v-shagroon-2012-ewca-civ-1507
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 27, 2012, 05:57 AM
Article ID : 101013

(Court of Appeal, Thorpe, Black LJJ, Hedley J, 21 November 2012)

The husband and wife went through a ceremony in London which purported to be an Islamic marriage ceremony. None of the formalities of the Marriage Acts were complied with. The husband was already married. When the relationship broke down the parties came to a financial agreement and the wife issued an application under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family proceedings Act 1984 which was adjourned and not to be activated unless the husband fell into breach of the agreement.

The husband pronounced talaq and when a heated dispute arose surrounding the financial agreement the wife sought to activate her application. The judge held that it was the validity of the divorce or annulment which was the crucial issue not the validity of the marriage and, therefore, the wife was entitled to make an application under the 1984 Act. The husband appealed.

The judge had not had the benefit of the judgment in Dukali v Lamrani [2012] EWHC 1748 (Fam) [2012] 2 FLR 1099, as it had only been decided a few days prior to this hearing. The judge had erred and in order for the wife to make an application the foreign divorce had to be based on a marriage validly recognised under English law. That could not be argued in this case and, therefore, the wife could not proceed with her claim.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from