Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Divorce: Maintaining your Trust in Jersey

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Title : Divorce: Maintaining your Trust in Jersey
Slug : divorce-maintaining-your-trust-in-jersey
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 17, 2008, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89167

Timothy Hanson and Mark Renouf Partners, Hanson Renouf, Jersey and Associate Members of No 5 Chambers, Birmingham.

In recent years, there appear to have been a growing number of divorce cases where an offshore trust has appeared all too conspicuously on an English court's radar and have either been dealt with or threatened by a variety of orders under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Two such cases, Charalambous v Charalambous [2004] EWCA Civ 1030, [2004] 2 FLR 1093 and Minwalla v Minwalla and DM Investments SA, Midfield Management SA and CI Law Trustees Ltd [2004] EWHC 2823 (Fam), [2005] 1 FLR 771 have highlighted issues relevant to trusts in the Bailiwick of Jersey, being the largest of the Channel Islands. As will be appreciated from these cases, Jersey enjoys its own legal system and there will, as a consequence, be a number of issues that arise when a Jersey trust is involved in such ancillary relief proceedings. This article examines the differing approaches of the English and Jersey courts in such circumstances and further looks at imminent changes to the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 that aim to increase confidence in assets held in a Jersey trust.

See September [2006] International Family Law 135 for the full article.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from