Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
Diverse parenting standards – beyond the mere ‘alternative’
May 29, 2020, 13:06 PM
The article considers the relevance of the ‘character’ of the parents when determining public law applications under s 31 Children Act 1989.
Meta Title :Diverse parenting standards – beyond the mere ‘alternative’
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
May 28, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :
Nicola Hall, New Court Chambers
Nicola Hall reviews the case law following on from the principle set out by Hedley J in Re L (Care: Threshold Criteria)  1 FLR 2050 that society must be willing to tolerate very diverse standards of parenting in light of the recent Court of Appeal decision of Re C (a child) (special guardianship order)  EWCA Civ 2281 (20 December 2019) in which it was unsuccessfully argued that the judge was wrong to have made a special guardianship order in circumstances whereby he had deemed the mother’s lifestyle and beliefs, described as going ‘well beyond merely alternative’, were sources of harm and a proper basis to sanction the long term removal of C from her care and that his decision offended this principle. The article considers the relevance of the ‘character’ of the parents when determining public law applications under s 31 Children Act 1989.
The full article will be published in the June issue of Family Law.