Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles

Diverse parenting standards – beyond the mere ‘alternative’

May 29, 2020, 13:06 PM
The article considers the relevance of the ‘character’ of the parents when determining public law applications under s 31 Children Act 1989.
Slug :
Meta Title : Diverse parenting standards – beyond the mere ‘alternative’
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 28, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Nicola Hall, New Court Chambers

Nicola Hall reviews the case law following on from the principle set out by Hedley J in Re L (Care: Threshold Criteria) [2007] 1 FLR 2050 that society must be willing to tolerate very diverse standards of parenting in light of the recent Court of Appeal decision of Re C (a child) (special guardianship order) [2019] EWCA Civ 2281 (20 December 2019) in which it was unsuccessfully argued that the judge was wrong to have made a special guardianship order in circumstances whereby he had deemed the mother’s lifestyle and beliefs, described as going ‘well beyond merely alternative’, were sources of harm and a proper basis to sanction the long term removal of C from her care and that his decision offended this principle. The article considers the relevance of the ‘character’ of the parents when determining public law applications under s 31 Children Act 1989. 

The full article will be published in the June issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.







Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
  • COVID-19
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from