Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Disabled woman returned home after Court of Protection finds local council unlawfully removed her from family

Sep 29, 2018, 19:55 PM
family law, court of protection, residential care, mental capacity act, autism, local authority
Lawyers at Irwin Mitchell, have successfully secured the return home of a young woman with autism and severe learning disabilities has been successfully returned after it was found the local authority’s decision to keep her in residential care with restricted access to her family was a serious breach of her human rights.
Slug : disabled-woman-returned-home-after-court-of-protection-finds-local-council-unlawfully-removed-her-from-family
Meta Title : Disabled woman returned home after Court of Protection finds local council unlawfully removed her from family
Meta Keywords : family law, court of protection, residential care, mental capacity act, autism, local authority
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 24, 2014, 06:59 AM
Article ID : 107105

Judge finds Somerset County Council was in serious breach of family’s human rights

Lawyers at Irwin Mitchell, have successfully secured the return home of a young woman with autism and severe learning disabilities has been successfully returned after it was found the local authority’s decision to keep her in residential care with restricted access to her family was a serious breach of her human rights.

In a judgment from the regional Court of Protection in Bristol which was published on 23 September his Honour Judge Nicholas R Marston found there were a series of ‘systemic failures’ by Somerset County Council which meant the 19-year-old woman, known only as ‘P’ for legal reasons and who was represented by Irwin Mitchell, instructed by the Official Solicitor as her litigation friend, was wrongly kept away from her family for over a year.

Irwin Mitchell says the case demonstrates the importance of ensuring all staff working within local authorities are given sufficient guidance and training about the Mental Capacity Act (MCA).

P, who has autism spectrum disorder and almost no verbal communication skills, was prevented by social services from returning to her family home in Yeovil in May last year following bruises to her chest being reported.

Despite teachers witnessing P’s violent behaviour on a school trip, including hitting herself in her chest area, social services did not carry out thorough investigations, instead concluding that it was ‘highly likely that P received significant injury from someone or something other than herself’ and took the decision that she should not return home following a stay in respite care.

P was then kept in a respite facility in Yeovil for 6 months and sedated with medication despite her family’s pleas for her to be allowed home. The local authority then moved P to an assessment and treatment unit after it was accepted that the respite placement was unsuitable, where she remained against her family’s wishes until the case was heard by the Court of Protection.

During a 10-day court hearing in Bristol in May this year, the judge found that a ‘competently conducted investigation by social services into the bruises would have swiftly concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to conclude P’s safety was at risk by returning her home.’

In addition, the Court criticised the local authority for failing to act in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act, for failing to bring the matter to the Court of Protection for a hearing on the matter for six months and for failing to consult with the family and inform them that they could make an application.

In total, P was kept in residential homes with restricted access to her family for nearly a year. The first facility was found to be inadequate to meet her complex care needs and she was sedated with medication without consulting her parents, which was also unlawful.

Somerset County Council admitted that P had been deprived of her liberty and apologised to the family for its ‘procedurally inappropriate and unlawful’ actions.

Following the 10-day hearing, the judge concluded that it was in P’s best interests that she was returned to the family home and that Somerset County Council had illustrated a failure to respect the human rights of both P and her family.

The full judgment is available here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
CourtofProtection2
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from