Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91

Feb 7, 2019, 14:55 PM
Financial remedies – Needs claim – Wife from wealthy background – Husband sought lump sum – Whether he had a need for the amount sought
The husband’s claim for a lump sum of £1.5m on a needs basis was refused.
Slug :
Meta Title : Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Needs claim – Wife from wealthy background – Husband sought lump sum – Whether he had a need for the amount sought
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 7, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Holman J, 11 December 2019)

Financial remedies – Needs claim – Wife from wealthy background – Husband sought lump sum – Whether he had a need for the amount sought

The husband’s claim for a lump sum of £1.5m on a needs basis was refused. 

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved

 

IN THE FAMILY COURT
[2018] EWFC 91

No. ZC16D00255

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand

London, WC2A 2LL

Tuesday, 11 December 2018

Before:
MR JUSTICE HOLMAN

(sitting throughout in public)

B E T W E E N :

ANKUL DAGA
Applicant

- and -

APARNA BANGUR
Respondent

_________

MR SIMON WEBSTER instructed by MISHCON DE REYA appeared on behalf of the applicant.
MR NICHOLAS CUSWORTH QC instructed by KINGSLEY NAPLEY LLP appeared on behalf of the respondent.

__________

JUDGMENT

(as approved by the judge)

Judgment: Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from