Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

RESIDENCE: Dabrowska v Poland (Application No 34568/08)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:33 PM
Slug : dabrowska-v-poland-application-no-34568-08
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 2, 2010, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88297

(European Court of Human Rights; 02 February 2010)

The father took his child on holiday, failed to return to matrimonial home and refused private contact with the child's mother. The court-appointed guardians refused to involve the police to recover the child, or to inform the public prosecutor. The mother's attempts to involve the public prosecutor were also unsuccessful. Eventually the court accepted the status quo and granted the father temporary custody of child.

Held that the state had failed to enforce binding decisions granting mother custody of her child, resulting in a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR. Future relations between parent and child should not be determined by the mere effluxion of time.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from