Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Criticisms made of fertility clinic

Sep 29, 2018, 22:47 PM
Private law children – Parentage – HFEA 2008 – Record keeping by fertility clinic – Whether consent forms had been signed prior to treatment – Whether a declaration of parentage should be made in favour of the father
In the judgment F v M and Others [2015] EWHC 3601 (Fam), [2016] FLR forthcoming, Pauffley J was concerned with a couple who conceived a child as a result of fertility treatment at a licensed clinic.
Slug : criticisms-made-of-fertility-clinic-which-failed-to-maintain-consent-records-respond-appropriately-to-the-legal-parenthood-audit-and-engage-in-litigation-concerning-a-declaration-of-parentage
Meta Title : Criticisms made of fertility clinic which failed to maintain consent records, respond appropriately to the Legal Parenthood Audit and engage in litigation concerning a declaration of parentage
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Parentage – HFEA 2008 – Record keeping by fertility clinic – Whether consent forms had been signed prior to treatment – Whether a declaration of parentage should be made in favour of the father
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 3, 2016, 06:16 AM
Article ID : 116931
In the judgment F v M and Others [2015] EWHC 3601 (Fam), [2016] FLR forthcoming, Pauffley J was concerned with a couple who conceived a child as a result of fertility treatment at a licensed clinic.

There was dispute as to whether written consent had been provided by both parties prior to treatment and the clinic had no record of a consent form. The mother applied for a declaration under s 55A of the Family Law Act 1986 that F was not the child's father. F also applied for a declaration that he was the father.

Although during the proceedings the mother conceded that there should be a declaration in favour of the father, the judge emphasised the President's comment in Re Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (Cases A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam), [2016] FLR forthcoming that such a declaration could not be granted by consent or default but only after a proper examination of the facts assessed in light of the applicable law.

Under sections 36 and 37 of the HFEA 2008, in order for a man to be treated as the father of a child, signed, written consent must be given by the man and the woman prior to the treatment. As highlighted by the President, where the consent forms had been mislaid the court could act on the available evidence to establish that the forms had been properly completed. The court could also correct mistakes on the form. In this instance the mother asserted that they had not completed consent forms. On the totality of the evidence the court found that they had completed the forms prior to treatment but that they had since been misplaced.

During the Legal Parenthood Audit which was initiated following the decision of AB v CD and the Z Fertility Clinic [2013] EWHC 1418, [2013] 2 FLR 1357, the medical files of these parents had not been included; although they should have been. An investigation would not begin at this fertility clinic to establish why this happened and to ensure that the anomaly with record keeping did not happen again. The clinic had now also installed Meditex which was a fertility database used across Europe that required consent forms to be scanned and retained.

The judge raised the wholly extraordinary litigation conduct of the clinic. The disclosure of medical records had been fraught and piecemeal despite the mother and F providing written authorisation for the release of documents. The clinic had failed to attend the first hearing and did not accept that it had failed to comply with the necessary procedure. A representative from the clinic only attended when an order requiring attendance was made with an attached penal notice.

Pauffley J commented on the clinic's bewildering behaviour, finding that it had added to the situation of enormous tension in circumstances which were already intensely fraught. The clinic's actions in failing to attempt to engage with the mother and F, to offer an apology of offer help, support or explanation had been a profoundly shocking state of affairs.

The medical director of the clinic accepted that the litigation conduct had been wholly unsatisfactory. He would offer a written and face-to-face apology and also answer any outstanding questions the parents had. The clinic would also meet the costs of the litigation.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from