Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

WILLS: Court v Despallieres; Re Ikin (Deceased)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Slug : court-v-despallieres-re-ikin-deceased
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 17, 2009, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87695

(Chancery Division; Arnold J; 17 December 2009)

The man entered into a civil partnership shortly after making a will leaving everything to the man who later became his civil partner. The will in question declared that the will would not be revoked by marriage, civil partnership or adoption. After the man's death, the civil partner asserted that the will had not been automatically revoked under Wills Act 1837, s 18B(1). The question arose whether the terms of the will made it clear (i) that it had been made in expectation of civil partnership with a particular person, and (ii) that the will should not be revoked by the formation of the civil partnership, in which case, within s 18B(3), the will would not be revoked by the civil partnership.

There was nothing in the will that showed that the deceased had expected to form a civil partnership, let alone a civil partnership with a particular person. There was nothing in the will to connect the provision stating that the will would not be revoked by a subsequent civil partnership to the bequest to the man who later became the civil partner.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from