Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

WILLS: Court v Despallieres; Re Ikin (Deceased)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Slug : court-v-despallieres-re-ikin-deceased
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 17, 2009, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87695

(Chancery Division; Arnold J; 17 December 2009)

The man entered into a civil partnership shortly after making a will leaving everything to the man who later became his civil partner. The will in question declared that the will would not be revoked by marriage, civil partnership or adoption. After the man's death, the civil partner asserted that the will had not been automatically revoked under Wills Act 1837, s 18B(1). The question arose whether the terms of the will made it clear (i) that it had been made in expectation of civil partnership with a particular person, and (ii) that the will should not be revoked by the formation of the civil partnership, in which case, within s 18B(3), the will would not be revoked by the civil partnership.

There was nothing in the will that showed that the deceased had expected to form a civil partnership, let alone a civil partnership with a particular person. There was nothing in the will to connect the provision stating that the will would not be revoked by a subsequent civil partnership to the bequest to the man who later became the civil partner.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from