Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Court of Appeal rule on what is reasonable punishment for children

Sep 29, 2018, 17:22 PM
Slug : court-of-appeal-rule-on-what-is-reasonable-punishment-for-children
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 4, 2009, 05:07 AM
Article ID : 89637

The Court of Appeal has upheld a High Court decision to dismiss care proceedings for three siblings, after one girl said she had been kicked and slapped by her parents.

The High Court judge found that the statutory threshold for making a care order had not been crossed. In the Court of Appeal ruling, Re MA (Care: Threshold) [2009] EWCA Civ 853, Lord Justice Ward said: "This is, as I understand it, the first time this court has had to consider where the dividing line between harm and significant harm is established.

The parents came to Swansea council social services' attention when it was discovered they had subjected a young girl in their care to what a judge described as "shocking treatment." That included regular beatings and threats that a dog would be set upon her.

After the parents' own daughter, known as "M", revealed that she had been kicked and slapped by both her parents, the couple's natural children were placed with foster parents and care proceedings were instigated by the council.

However, Mr Justice Roderick Wood, a High Court judge in Cardiff, dismissed the care proceedings having found that in his view the children had not suffered "significant harm".

Last week the children's court-appointed guardian challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal, where solicitor advocate Graham Jones argued it was "irrational" of Mr Justice Wood not to order that all the children be taken into care. But the court upheld the Mr Justice Roderick Wood's decision.

The hearing related to two homosexual parents, a "wealthy well-educated" father and his wife trapped in a loveless marriage. They conceived three natural children despite only ever having had sex on a single occasion, and thereafter used artificial insemination.

The ruling means the children, who were kept away from their parents pending the ruling, will now be returned to their parents.

Delivering the judgement, Lord Justice Ward, said: "On an unspecified occasion, or occasions, M was slapped on her hand by her parents, she was slapped on her face by her mother, kicked by her father, kicked by her mother, hit on the side of her face by her father, hit to the right-hand side of her face, kicked and pushed by her father.

"It sounds terrible. It could speak of a persistent campaign of abuse causing real suffering.

"But it could equally amount, in fact, to no more than a handful of isolated minor acts of chastisement forgotten as soon as administered.

"Yes, it amounts to ill treatment and therefore to harm.

"Yet, despite intensive outside intervention in this family's life, no-one ever saw a mark on that little girl and the stark fact is that she appeared to be well nourished, well cared for and with close attachments to her parents.

"So was the harm significant? That was for the judge to decide.

"The harm must, in my judgement, be significant enough to justify the intervention of the state and disturb the autonomy of the parents to bring up their children by themselves in the way they choose.

"The judge heard this case for six days. He is highly experienced in this class of case. The nuances would set his antennae reverberating.

"In my judgement he was fully entitled to come to the conclusion that he did. I am inclined to think that I may well have come to the same conclusion myself."

Lady Justice Hallett agreed with Lord Justice Ward's assessment, saying: "Reasonable physical chastisement of children by parents is not yet unlawful in this country.

"Slaps and even kicks vary enormously in their seriousness.

"A kick sounds particularly unpleasant, yet many a parent may have nudged their child's nappied bottom with their foot in gentle play without committing an assault.

"Many a parent will have slapped a child on the hand to make the point that running out into a busy road is a dangerous thing to do. What M alleged therefore was not necessarily indicative of abuse. It will all depend on circumstances."

Greta Thomas, director of NSPCC Cymru/Wales, said: "Currently the law in the UK on hitting is confusing and leaves children of all ages vulnerable to abuse.

"It is a national embarrassment that the UK is one of only five remaining EU countries which have not given children equal protection under the law on assault or committed to doing so.

"There is a danger that the use of physical punishment by parents and carers can escalate and may result in serious harm to a child.

"Changing the law to make physical punishment of children illegal would provide a clear basis for child protection and the promotion of alternative forms of discipline."

Click here for the Newswatch case update of Re MA (Care: Threshold) [2009] EWCA Civ 853

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from