Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Costs in children cases (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:04 PM
family law, children proceedings, private law, legal representation, divorce
​In ‘Costs in private law children proceedings: what now?’, published in the September issue of Family Law, Barrister ​Nicola Fox from 1 King’s Bench Walk looks at that core of cases which is not resolvable by dispute resolution and for which parties instruct legal representatives to help them.
Slug : costs-in-children-cases
Meta Title : Costs in children cases (£)
Meta Keywords : family law, children proceedings, private law, legal representation, divorce
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 9, 2014, 02:06 AM
Article ID : 106929
Family Law

In ‘Costs in private law children proceedings: what now?’, published in the September issue of Family Law, Barrister Nicola Fox from 1 King’s Bench Walk looks at that core of cases which is not resolvable by dispute resolution and for which parties instruct legal representatives to help them. These include cases where there are factual disputes (eg allegations of serious sexual or physical abuse) or where there is little possibility of agreement (eg an application to permanently remove the child to another country). For these life-changing decisions, many parties instruct legal representation, often at great personal financial sacrifice. In such circumstances, what is the current position with respect to costs orders in these proceedings?

Under FPR 2010, r 28.1 the court may at any time make such order as to costs as it thinks just. The power to order costs is governed by CPR 1998 Parts 44, 46, 47 and 45.8 (except 44.2(2), (3), 44.10(2), (3), 46 and 47). The rule that costs follow the event does not apply in family proceedings. There is no mention of costs in the new FPR 12B for the Child Arrangements Programme. The leading case remains R v R (Costs: Child Case) [1997] 2 FLR 95 where the father had been ordered to pay the mother’s costs on account of the father’s conduct being held to have been unreasonable. Other reported cases looked at show costs orders being made following failure to comply with contact orders and in cases where the conduct of the litigation goes beyond the ordinary concerns of parents and putting their case reasonably. Nicola Fox goes on to outline more example cases and then turns to non-party costs’ orders and cases where such orders have been made. Parties can also obtain costs allowances to fund Children Act litigation, (see CF V KM (Financial Provision for Child: Costs of Legal Proceedings ) [2010] EWHC 1754 (Fam), [2011] 1 FLR 208; R v F [2011] 2 FLR 991.

Ms Fox concludes that there are certain categories of cases where a costs order may be appropriate:

  • case of no/little merit;
  • vexatious action; 
  • unreasonable conduct of litigation; 
  • proceedings are harmful to the children; 
  • free-standing fact finding where determination largely one way.

Taking into account the Family Procedure Rules 2010 and the new Child Arrangements Programme, maybe the following are appropriate too:

  • if a party refuses to mediate;
  • if a party fails to comply with the rules and practice directions;
  • if a party refuses to attend a SPIP
  • if a party breaches orders.

The full version of this article appears in the September 2014 issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from