Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
The Legal Rights and Wrongs of Puberty Blocking in England
Hannah Hirst, PhD student, University of Liverpool, School of Law and Social JusticeKeywords: Puberty blockers – children’s rights – access to health – UNCRC –...
Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave To Apply To Discharge) [2021] EWCA Civ 442
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Peter Jackson, Baker, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 26 March 2021)Public Law Children – Special guardianship – Leave to apply to discharge SGO – Refusal...
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam)
(Family Division, Lieven J, 26 March 2021)Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in Bell – Whether parents could...
Re H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), President, King, Holroyde LJJ, 30 March 2021)Private law children - Domestic Abuse – Fact finding – ApproachThe Court of Appeal provided guidance in four...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
View all articles

Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 4122 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 20:13 PM
Financial remedies – Special contribution – Departure from equality
The wife was awarded $530m after the judge found the husband’s special contribution and post-separation accrual of wealth justified a significant departure from equality.
Slug : cooper-hohn-v-hohn-2014-ewhc-4122-fam
Meta Title : Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 4122 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Special contribution – Departure from equality
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 23, 2014, 04:06 AM
Article ID : 108079
(Family Division, Roberts J, 12 December2014)

[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote is now published in Family Law Reports [2015] 1 FLR 745]

Financial remedies – Special contribution – Departure from equality

Please see attached file below for the full judgment

The wife was awarded $530m after the judge found the husband’s special contribution and post-separation accrual of wealth justified a significant departure from equality.

In financial remedy proceedings initiated by the wife the parties had assets totaling between $1.35bn and £1.6bn. In addition to their personal wealth a further $4.5bn had been channeled into a charitable foundation.

In relation to the personal wealth the husband submitted that much of the sum represented post-separation accrual since the breakdown of the marriage in 2012. He claimed this justified a departure from the principle of equality. Furthermore he contended that his creation of wealth fell to be considered as a special and unmatched contribution which also justified a reduction in the wife’s entitlement. He proposed that the wife should receive one-third of the assets available in April 2012 when the marriage broke down and one half of one third of the post-separation accrual since then. The wife sought a full and equal share of the current assets.

The law required the court to consider the value of the assets as they stood at the date of trial. The relevance of the date of separation lay in the interruption of spousal contributions. Each case was fact specific and there was no presumption of equal division nor any bias in favour of the money earner. A departure from equality was permitted on the basis of a special contribution including the acquisition of wealth through the exercise of some special individual skill and effort.

On the facts of this case a significant departure from equality in the husband’s favour was entirely justified by the compounding factors of post-separation accrual and special contribution. The financial returns were achieved by the husband’s activist investment strategies and there was no guarantee that they could have been matched by the wife.Wealth creation on the scale achieved by the husband was possible due to his ability to identify a new investment opportunity and make it work. The investments created by the husband after the separation fell at a point too distant from the essential character of the matrimonial partnership to qualify.

The wife was awarded $530m from available assets of just under $1.5bn which equated to 36% of the global resources. The wife would bear her share of any contingent tax risks and she also had to make provision for the escrow which would be established in respect of tax indemnity. Such an award properly reflected her contributions and her entitled to a fair share of the marital acquest and post-separation accrual.

Case No: FD12D01549

Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 4122 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 12 December 2014

Before :

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :


- and -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Martin Pointer QC, Stephen Brandon QC, Geoffrey Kingscote and Oliver Marre (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the Petitioner Wife
Lewis Marks QC, Elizabeth Clarke and Emma Chamberlain  (instructed by Withers LLP) for the Respondent Husband

Hearing dates: 1st to the 11th July 2014

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 4122 (Fam) 
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from