Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT: L County Council v MD and ID

Sep 29, 2018, 18:58 PM
Slug : contempt-l-county-council-v-md-and-id
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2014, 03:30 AM
Article ID : 104443

(Family Division, Hayden J, 6 December 2013)

The parents of six children had a volatile relationship characterised by domestic violence. The local authority found the parents unwilling to co-operate with their investigations and there were concerns for their engagement with health and educational services for the children.

The family fled to Ireland to escape professional involvement but during their stay there were reports of a domestic violence incident at the hotel they were staying at and the father was subsequently arrested on a European Arrest Warrant for outstanding DV incidents against his wife.

The mother returned to England where a child protection conference was convened and the children were registered under the category of neglect in circumstances where their whereabouts remained unknown. Since then three of the children, aged 15, 5 and 3 were flown to Pakistan. The matter was transferred to the High Court in order to locate and secure their return. Return orders had been made and penal notices attached but the children remained in Pakistan. Committal proceedings were initiated.

The judge had no hesitation in finding that the parents were in breach of the orders, and that, the father in particular knew the whereabouts of the children but refused to disclose it and that he was able to secure their return but refused to do so.

The father was in flagrant contempt of the court orders and had lied repeatedly. While it was clear from observing the mother that her autonomy had been systematically eroded by her husband's bullying dominance, she had continuously lied and failed to follow the advice of the local authority. She was, therefore, also beyond reasonable doubt in contempt of the orders. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from