Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT: L County Council v MD and ID

Sep 29, 2018, 18:58 PM
Slug : contempt-l-county-council-v-md-and-id
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2014, 03:30 AM
Article ID : 104443

(Family Division, Hayden J, 6 December 2013)

The parents of six children had a volatile relationship characterised by domestic violence. The local authority found the parents unwilling to co-operate with their investigations and there were concerns for their engagement with health and educational services for the children.

The family fled to Ireland to escape professional involvement but during their stay there were reports of a domestic violence incident at the hotel they were staying at and the father was subsequently arrested on a European Arrest Warrant for outstanding DV incidents against his wife.

The mother returned to England where a child protection conference was convened and the children were registered under the category of neglect in circumstances where their whereabouts remained unknown. Since then three of the children, aged 15, 5 and 3 were flown to Pakistan. The matter was transferred to the High Court in order to locate and secure their return. Return orders had been made and penal notices attached but the children remained in Pakistan. Committal proceedings were initiated.

The judge had no hesitation in finding that the parents were in breach of the orders, and that, the father in particular knew the whereabouts of the children but refused to disclose it and that he was able to secure their return but refused to do so.

The father was in flagrant contempt of the court orders and had lied repeatedly. While it was clear from observing the mother that her autonomy had been systematically eroded by her husband's bullying dominance, she had continuously lied and failed to follow the advice of the local authority. She was, therefore, also beyond reasonable doubt in contempt of the orders. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from