Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re C (Contact: Appeal)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:33 PM
Slug : contact-re-c-contact-appeal
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 19, 2012, 10:50 AM
Article ID : 100947

(Court of Appeal, Rix, Black, Lewison LJJ, 14 November 2012)

When the two children were removed from their parents' care, contact arrangements were put in place. Although there had been some successful contact between the father and children he had also said very damaging things to them and was unwilling to accept criticisms of his behaviour. The local authority was granted a s 34(4) order permitting a cessation of contact between the father and children.

The father appealed, claiming that contact had not been the intended focus of the particular hearing and that the application for a s 34(4) order had not been made in advance and the father was only made aware of it on the day prior to the hearing.

The Court of Appeal found on the evidence that the father knew in advance the nature of the application the local authority was making and the basis upon which it was being made. He was aware of the issues and had the opportunity to address them before the order was granted.

The judge's three judgments had to be read together. A family judge built up knowledge of the family over a period of time. It was helpful if the judge made reference to earlier judgments but a failure to do so did not mean the earlier judgments should not be incorporated.

Appeal dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from