Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

CONTACT: Re C (Contact)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:33 PM
Slug : contact-re-c-contact
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 21, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100957

(Court of Appeal, Sir John Thomas P, Moses, Black LJJ, 14 November 2012)

The mother of three children had a history of mental illness. While the father was on a trip abroad her mental health deteriorated significantly and the local authority obtained an emergency protection order and an interim care order.

At a subsequent hearing it was determined that the children would not be able to return home. As to the question of contact, it was found that at times the father was affectionate towards the children but on occasion he had said things which were distressing and harmful. The judge ordered contact on 8 occasions per year but the father refused to sign a contact agreement.

When a final care order was granted the judge heard evidence that during contact the father had made inappropriate comments which had undermined the foster placement. The judge granted the local authority an order under s 34(4) of the Children Act 1989. The father appealed.

The appeal was dismissed. Procedurally there had been no error in the course adopted by the judge. The father had advance warning of the application and was capable of dealing with the matters which had caused concern. The judge was entitled to make the s 34(4) order given that the earlier identified problems had not been resolved.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from