Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Contact Disputes: Towards meeting the needs of children

Sep 29, 2018, 17:36 PM
Slug : contact-disputes-towards-meeting-the-needs-of-children
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 2, 2006, 05:23 AM
Article ID : 88703
Anthony W Baker, Consultant in Child and Family Psychiatry, Ashwood Medico-Legal Consultancy, Woking, Surrey

In some well-publicised cases, the question of contact working well for children is problematical. When parents cannot reconcile their differences in the context of their separation there is a risk that the child's relationship with the non-resident parent will suffer. There is a presumption in law (see Waite J in Re B (Minors: Access) [1992] 1 FLR 140) that a child should have contact with both birth parents for the purposes of: identity with roots; making and sustaining a beneficent relationship; and allowing the child to draw upon their experience of each parent to establish their own self-identity and self-esteem. The caveat to this presumption is that only in the context of compelling reasons, for instance, proven child protection concerns or domestic violence, should direct contact between a child and parent be denied.

In relation to the question of maintaining contact with birth parents, the author has identified five criteria that would need to be fulfilled in the context of child who is no longer living with his or her birth parents but in substitute care. The five criteria are looked at in depth in the article.

See August [2006] Fam Law 682 for the full article.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from