Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROCEEDINGS: Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878

Sep 29, 2018, 16:25 PM
Slug : clayton-v-clayton-2006-ewca-civ-878
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 4, 2006, 05:14 AM
Article ID : 85159

(Court of Appeal; Sir Mark Potter P, Arden and Wall LJJ; 27 June 2006)

Section 97(2) of the Children Act 1989, which prohibited publication of any material 'intended or likely to identify ... any child as being involved in any proceedings', related to current proceedings, and the prohibition ended once the proceedings were concluded. The provisions of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 which were apt to prevent publication or reporting of the substance of or issues in proceedings involving minors were not thereby diluted. Nor were parents free to draw their children into an ongoing public debate. The court retained its welfare jurisdiction, enabling intervention where a child's welfare was put at risk by inappropriate parental identification for publicity purposes. The court was obliged, in the face of a challenge, to conduct a balancing exercise between competing human rights under Art 8 and Art 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950. It would be appropriate for every tribunal, when making a final order, to consider whether there was an outstanding welfare issue which needed to be addressed by a continuing order for anonymity.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from