Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
View all articles
Authors

Civil Partnership Dissolution

Sep 29, 2018, 16:14 PM
Title : Civil Partnership Dissolution
Slug : civil-partnership-dissolution
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : May 31, 2006, 04:21 AM
Article ID : 85123

By Spencer Clarke, Forsters LLP. A lesbian couple is apparently seeking the first dissolution of their civil partnership. Their relationship ended 3 months after the registration of their civil partnership at Ashford Register Office in Kent in February 2006. As with heterosexual marriage, it is not possible to apply for dissolution before a year has elapsed from the date of the formation of the civil partnership. Therefore, the couple will not be able to dissolve their civil partnership until February 2007. Heterosexual couples can cite adultery as a fact but adultery was omitted in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 from the list of facts proving irretrievable breakdown of the relationship because it is defined as sexual intercourse with a person of the opposite sex, other than the spouse, during the marriage.

Although, the couple cannot apply for a dissolution order before a year has elapsed from the date of the formation of the civil partnership, either could apply, within the year, for a separation order (akin to judicial separation) on the basis of the same facts as would be put forward to support an order for dissolution, and the same financial relief would be available. See July [2006] Fam Law for the full news article.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from