Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Rattan v Kuwad [2021] EWCA Civ 1
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Macur, Moylan and Asplin LJJ, 11 January 2021)Financial remedies – Maintenance pending suit – Order set aside – AppealThe wife’s appeal from...
SMO (a child) (by their litigation friend (acting as a representative claimant pursuant to CPR 19.6)) v TikTok Inc. and others [2020] EWHC 3589 (QB)
(Queen's Bench Division, Warby J, 30 December 2020)Practice and procedure - Anonymity – 12-year-old bringing claim against TikTok for breach of data protection legislation – Claimant...
Coronavirus: Separated Families and Contact with Children in Care FAQs (UK)
The House of Commons Library has published a paper providing brief information in response to some key questions regarding the impact of the Coronavirus outbreak on separated families,...
The Benefit Of Cohabitation Agreements
Many couples in Britain today live together without being married or forming a civil partnership. For some, the legal status of this situation isn’t well understood - do unmarried cohabitants...
Wills and Coronavirus
With the coronavirus pandemic we have seen a significant increase in demand for Wills. However, the social distancing, lockdown and shielding measures introduced by the Government to help fight the...
View all articles

Chris Barton's Sketch

Oct 12, 2018, 09:40 AM
Slug : chris-barton-s-sketch-3
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 17, 2010, 09:50 AM
Article ID : 90895

Chris Barton It appears that the marriage tax allowance is to be reinstated. But if chucking money at matrimony is the right way to honour it, why not just give the lie to those headlines about the average cost of weddings being the cost of a small car, or whatever it is this week.  A wedding licence from the registrar's office is £94. Not counting the £3.50 for the marriage certificate on the day.

It may be too late for the Burden sisters, but there remains an argument in favour of extending civil partnership to such consanguines. Registration does not require a couple to have sex (no non-consummation ground for nullity, although it might be inferred from the ‘unreasonable behaviour' fact for dissolution) and the partners do not even have to be gay.  As a result it is perfectly possible for two persons of the same gender to (mis)use the 2004 Act for tax advantage - in the same way as a male/female pair can misuse marriage.

The new Government is on to something with its proposal that a 55% majority be needed to dissolve Parliament: perhaps it could be extended to jury verdicts, the yardstick for financial relief on divorce per White (2000) and the burden of proof in care proceedings (In Re B (Children) (Care orders: Standard of proof (2008)).

Horror: I thought that dumbing down started the year after I went to university which was, per Phillip Larkin, ‘Between the end of the Chatterley Ban/And the Beatles first LP'. Yet according to Edmund Crispin it was actually a lot earlier (‘The undergraduates get more moronic every passing moment', Holy Disorders (1946)). So the rest of you must be practically invertebrate by now.

Professor Chris Barton is a retired Family Law Teacher, Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association and a regular contributor to Family Law. Click here to follow Chris Barton on Twitter

The views expressed by contributing authors are not necessarily those of Family Law or Jordan Publishing and should not be considered as legal advice.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from