Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Children’s rights, views and interests not on the agenda of Parliament or the President, claims report

Sep 29, 2018, 22:00 PM
family law, transparency, Safeguarding, Privacy, Children, Young People, media access
Title : Children’s rights, views and interests not on the agenda of Parliament or the President, claims report
Slug : children-s-rights-views-and-interests-not-on-the-agenda-of-parliament-or-the-president-claims-report
Meta Keywords : family law, transparency, Safeguarding, Privacy, Children, Young People, media access
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 30, 2014, 06:40 AM
Article ID : 106507
A study exploring the degree to which children and young people have a right to have their private lives kept private has been published today.

The report, Safeguarding, Privacy and Respect for Children and Young People and the Next Steps in Media Access to Family Courts, authored by Dr Julia Brophy with Kate Perry, Alison Prescott and Christine Renouf (in conjunction with NYAS and Association of Lawyers for Children) shows that a child’s safety and well-being during court processes and in the longer term are of the utmost importance.

The study suggests that Parliament should be given the opportunity to scrutinise proposals to increase media access and reporting of family cases. This is particularly important as the safeguards originally set out by Parliament have now been removed.

In the context of the views of young people, the proposals should also be subject to a proper public consultation exercise, accompanied by widespread publicity making it clear what is proposed, what children think to date, and helping all people to respond. The consultation should be undertaken in a timescale that reflects the gravity of the issues for children and it should actively seek ways to reach many audiences so that the views of other children are captured.

Young people said it does not appear that children’s rights, views and interests are clearly on the agenda of Parliament or the President of the Family Division.

An exclusive article by Dr Julia Brophy will be published in the October issue of Family Law. A further article by Dr Brophy outlining the proposed recommendations of the study will appear on familylaw.co.uk in the coming weeks.

The full report is available to download here.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
transparency
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from