Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles

Children's Involvement in Court

Sep 29, 2018, 17:36 PM
Slug : children-s-involvement-in-court
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 25, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88759

At the Children Law UK conference in December 2005, the President of the Family Division, Sir Mark Potter stated:

'I would like to finish with a thought which may provoke discussion, and that is whether we should review the reluctance of the English judge to talk to children in private. This regularly occurs on the continent of Europe. Wall LJ notes in Mabon v Mabon that this reluctance is rooted in the rules of evidence and the adversarial mode of trial; that what is said in private by the child to the judge cannot be tested in evidence or in cross-examination; and that the judge cannot therefore promise confidentiality. In an effort to ensure the welfare and happiness of the children, and to listen to their voice first-hand should we not be encouraging judges to talk to the children in private, trusting the judge who has done so to retail the burden of his concerns as a result, whilst respecting the confidence of the child in sensitive areas.'

In Every Child Matters (Department of Health, 2003) the Government stressed the importance of involving children and young people and listening to their views.

District Judge Nicholas Crichton says there is a growing feeling that courts need to accommodate the wishes of children to be heard or to take ownership of some part of the proceedings, in which decisions will be taken which will have an important bearing on their lives. Some children may want only to meet the judge who will make the decision, either before the hearing to make sure that the judge has understood their wishes and feelings; or after the hearing to have the decision explained to them. Some may want to give evidence. Some may prefer not to take any part and to leave the decision to the court. What is important is that the alternatives are discussed with the child and that he/she should be given the choice. This means providing the child with the information to enable him/her to understand the whole process, and then discussing it with him/her in order to establish how best to meet his/her individual needs in relation to a process which has the potential to affect the rest of his/her life.

See March [2006] Fam Law 170 for the full news article by District Judge Nicholas Crichton.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

The Court of Appeal's decision in Mabon v Mabon can be found in [2005] 2 FLR 1011.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law Reports online.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from