Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Children Law Update 2009: Public Law

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : children-law-update-2009-public-law
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 6, 2009, 10:49 AM
Article ID : 85843

Maryam Akhavan-Tabib, Barrister, Coram Chambers

Care Proceedings: Fact-finding hearings
Re G and B (Fact-Finding Hearing) [2009] EWCA Civ 10, [2009] 1 FLR 1145, Court of Appeal

The child died at the age of 7 months because a subnormal level of oxygen had restricted the blood supply to the brain. The child had also suffered earlier injuries including a fracture of the arm and damage to the ribs. In care proceedings relating to the child's two older siblings, the local authority sought threshold findings including: (1) a finding that neglectful and harmful parenting practices had been a contributory factor in the child's death; and (2) a finding that the parents had failed to give a clear and consistent account of events leading to the child's hospitalisation. At the hearing, the medical evidence was that the cause of the child's death was unknown. The judge asked whether it had been on balance an unlawful killing to which the expert replied that he had no pathological findings to support such a conclusion, although it was possible. The judge made a note that unlawful killing was probable. The father was refused an adjournment to allow him to obtain medical evidence on this issue. Among the judge's findings was a finding that the child had been unlawfully killed by means of suffocation and a finding that the father was more likely than not to have been the perpetrator. The father appealed.

To read the rest of this article, see October [2009] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from