Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE/HUMAN RIGHTS: Charalambous v Cyprus

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : charalambous-v-cyprus
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 28, 2007, 07:05 AM
Article ID : 86775

(European Court of Human Rights; 19 July 2007)

The Cypriot husband filed for a divorce from the Romanian wife, in Cyprus. The wife raised preliminary points of law. The main divorce and the interim proceedings were adjourned eight times in 9 months, six times by the parties, and twice by the courts. In the meantime, the Cypriot immigration authorities issued a deportation order against the wife, who resisted on the basis that she needed to be able to attend the divorce proceedings. After the wife's deportation the divorce was granted, but the wife's appeal was eventually allowed, on the basis that she should have been permitted to remain in Cyprus for the trial. After over 5 years, the divorce was finally granted. The husband complained that the length of proceedings had been unreasonable, in breach of Art 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Although there had been no breach of the Art 8 right to respect for family life, and no breach of the Art 12 right to marry, the length of proceedings had been excessive and failed to meet the 'reasonable time' requirement, in breach of Art 6(1). The nature of the case had not been complex. On the whole there had been no major delays attributable to the husband, although there had been considerable delays at the first instance and appeal stages. Special diligence had been required because of the possible consequences which delay might have, notably on enjoyment of the right to respect for family life.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from