Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
View all articles
Authors

DIVORCE/HUMAN RIGHTS: Charalambous v Cyprus

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : charalambous-v-cyprus
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 28, 2007, 07:05 AM
Article ID : 86775

(European Court of Human Rights; 19 July 2007)

The Cypriot husband filed for a divorce from the Romanian wife, in Cyprus. The wife raised preliminary points of law. The main divorce and the interim proceedings were adjourned eight times in 9 months, six times by the parties, and twice by the courts. In the meantime, the Cypriot immigration authorities issued a deportation order against the wife, who resisted on the basis that she needed to be able to attend the divorce proceedings. After the wife's deportation the divorce was granted, but the wife's appeal was eventually allowed, on the basis that she should have been permitted to remain in Cyprus for the trial. After over 5 years, the divorce was finally granted. The husband complained that the length of proceedings had been unreasonable, in breach of Art 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Although there had been no breach of the Art 8 right to respect for family life, and no breach of the Art 12 right to marry, the length of proceedings had been excessive and failed to meet the 'reasonable time' requirement, in breach of Art 6(1). The nature of the case had not been complex. On the whole there had been no major delays attributable to the husband, although there had been considerable delays at the first instance and appeal stages. Special diligence had been required because of the possible consequences which delay might have, notably on enjoyment of the right to respect for family life.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from