Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

CHANGE OF NAME: Re W (Change of Name)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:12 PM
Slug : change-of-name-re-w-change-of-name
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 27, 2013, 09:41 AM
Article ID : 103403

(Court of Appeal, Jackson, Ryder LJJ, 20 August 2013)

The parents of the one year old child separated before his birth. The mother sent a message to the father informing him of the birth and they discussed name choices before agreeing to use the father's name as the child's middle name. The mother later changed her mind and didn't use the father's name when she registered the birth.

During contact proceedings the father applied to change the child's name to include his own as originally intended but the mother claimed she had been in no state to object to the father's controlling behaviour after her caesarean section. The judge rejected that submission and permitted the change of name. The mother appealed.

The appeal was allowed. The test was one of purely welfare having regard to the welfare checklist. At the time the judge considered the application the welfare aspect was neutral and did not require an order of the kind he made.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from