Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CHANGE OF NAME: Re W (Change of Name)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:12 PM
Slug : change-of-name-re-w-change-of-name
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 27, 2013, 09:41 AM
Article ID : 103403

(Court of Appeal, Jackson, Ryder LJJ, 20 August 2013)

The parents of the one year old child separated before his birth. The mother sent a message to the father informing him of the birth and they discussed name choices before agreeing to use the father's name as the child's middle name. The mother later changed her mind and didn't use the father's name when she registered the birth.

During contact proceedings the father applied to change the child's name to include his own as originally intended but the mother claimed she had been in no state to object to the father's controlling behaviour after her caesarean section. The judge rejected that submission and permitted the change of name. The mother appealed.

The appeal was allowed. The test was one of purely welfare having regard to the welfare checklist. At the time the judge considered the application the welfare aspect was neutral and did not require an order of the kind he made.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from