Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

Chai v Peng (No 2) [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:29 PM
Slug : chai-v-peng-no-2-2014-ewhc-1519-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 2, 2014, 04:48 AM
Article ID : 116617

(Family Division, Holman J, 1 May 2014)


[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2015] 1 FLR 637]

Please see the attached file below for the full judgment.

Divorce – Jurisdiction – Maintenance pending suit

The wife was granted permission to withdraw her current divorce petition and issue a fresh one in order to anchor the date for domicile and habitual residence and further orders for maintenance pending suit were made.

The husband and wife were married for 42 years. The wife, who had no independent means, lived in England and Wales and initiated divorce proceedings there while the wealthy husband claimed to be living in Malaysia and brought proceedings there. The issue of jurisdiction was scheduled to be heard later in the year but the wife applied for maintenance pending suit and also for permission to issue a fresh divorce petition in order to anchor the date for which domicile and habitual residence were decided which she argued would eliminate areas of dispute from the jurisdiction proceedings. The wife was granted permission to withdraw her petition and issue fresh proceedings.

The judge further ordered the wife be paid £35,000 pm pending the jurisdiction hearing, £60,000 to cover the costs of further negotiations and £30,000 pm for legal costs. The wife’s application for an order for £115,000 to discharge her outstanding legal costs was refused.

The fully referenced, judicially approved judgment and headnote will appear in a forthcoming issue of Family Law Reports. A detailed summary and analysis of the case will appear in Family Law. __________________________________________________________________

Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)
     No. FD13D00747
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
     FAMILY DIVISION
     Royal Courts of Justice

1st May 2014

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE HOLMAN (sitting throughout in public) 

___________________

PAULINE SIEW PHIN CHAI
 Petitioner

- and -

TAN SRI DR KHOO KAY PENG
 Respondent

____________________

MR R. TODD QC and MR N. YATES (instructed by Vardags) appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
     MR T. BISHOP QC, MRS R. BAILEY-HARRIS and MISS K. COOK (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) appeared on behalf of the respondent.

____________________

JUDGMENT


Chai v Peng (No 2) [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Marriage and Divorce
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from