Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Chai v Peng (No 2) [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:29 PM
Slug : chai-v-peng-no-2-2014-ewhc-1519-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 2, 2014, 04:48 AM
Article ID : 116617

(Family Division, Holman J, 1 May 2014)


[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2015] 1 FLR 637]

Please see the attached file below for the full judgment.

Divorce – Jurisdiction – Maintenance pending suit

The wife was granted permission to withdraw her current divorce petition and issue a fresh one in order to anchor the date for domicile and habitual residence and further orders for maintenance pending suit were made.

The husband and wife were married for 42 years. The wife, who had no independent means, lived in England and Wales and initiated divorce proceedings there while the wealthy husband claimed to be living in Malaysia and brought proceedings there. The issue of jurisdiction was scheduled to be heard later in the year but the wife applied for maintenance pending suit and also for permission to issue a fresh divorce petition in order to anchor the date for which domicile and habitual residence were decided which she argued would eliminate areas of dispute from the jurisdiction proceedings. The wife was granted permission to withdraw her petition and issue fresh proceedings.

The judge further ordered the wife be paid £35,000 pm pending the jurisdiction hearing, £60,000 to cover the costs of further negotiations and £30,000 pm for legal costs. The wife’s application for an order for £115,000 to discharge her outstanding legal costs was refused.

The fully referenced, judicially approved judgment and headnote will appear in a forthcoming issue of Family Law Reports. A detailed summary and analysis of the case will appear in Family Law. __________________________________________________________________

Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)
     No. FD13D00747
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
     FAMILY DIVISION
     Royal Courts of Justice

1st May 2014

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE HOLMAN (sitting throughout in public) 

___________________

PAULINE SIEW PHIN CHAI
 Petitioner

- and -

TAN SRI DR KHOO KAY PENG
 Respondent

____________________

MR R. TODD QC and MR N. YATES (instructed by Vardags) appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
     MR T. BISHOP QC, MRS R. BAILEY-HARRIS and MISS K. COOK (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) appeared on behalf of the respondent.

____________________

JUDGMENT


Chai v Peng (No 2) [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Marriage and Divorce
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from