Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

Chai v Peng and Others [2017] EWHC 792 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:50 PM
Financial remedies – Sharing case – Special contribution – Value and division of assets
A financial remedies order was made on the basis of an equal sharing of the matrimonial assets
Slug : chai-v-peng-and-others-2017-ewhc-792-fam
Meta Title : Chai v Peng and Others [2017] EWHC 792 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Sharing case – Special contribution – Value and division of assets
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 11, 2017, 05:20 AM
Article ID : 114037

(Family Division, Bodey J, 6 April 2017)

Financial remedies – Sharing case – Special contribution – Value and division of assets

A financial remedies order was made on the basis of an equal sharing of the matrimonial assets

The Malaysian husband and wife were married in 1970 in Malaysia. During the marriage the wife obtained Australian and Canadian citizenship after spending significant period of time living in those jurisdictions with the five children. The marriage broke down in 2012 and the wife initiated divorce proceedings in the UK in 2014.

A number of hearings had taken place since then and the issues that now fell to be determined were the value, content and division of the assets. The wife sought an equal division of the total assets which she asserted were worth £205.8m. The husband offered £15m including £5.98m which had already been awarded to her by way of maintenance pending suit and legal services payment orders. He asserted that this was a needs not a sharing case.

Bodey J held that in circumstances where the parties had been married for 42 years and they had five children together this was plainly a sharing case. It could not be disputed that the husband had been a hugely successful businessman but when that substantial contribution was pitched against the wife’s substantial contribution as a mother and home maker, there could be no departure from equality based upon their respective contributions to the marriage. The total assets amounted to just over £161m. The husband’s interest in land in the UK, Canada and Australia would be transferred to the wife plus a lump sum of £40.6m. There would be a deduction in respect of the amounts the wife had already received.

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 792 (Fam)

Case No: FD13D 00747


Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 6th April 2017



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



- and –


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transcript of the Stenograph and Shorthand Notes of Marten Walsh Cherer Ltd.,
1st Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP
Telephone: 020 7067 2900 Fax: 020 7831 6864 DX: 410 LDE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MR. RICHARD TODD QC and MR. NICHOLAS YATES (instructed by Vardags) for the Applicant
MR. CHRISTOPHER WAGSTAFFE QC and MISS AMBER SHERIDAN (instructed by Shakespeare Martineau LLP) for the 1st Respondent, Tan Sri Dr. Khoo Kay Peng
MR. YASH BHEEROO (instructed by Ariff Rozhan & Co.) for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Chai v Peng [2017] EWHC 792 (Fam).rtf
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports.
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from