Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
What happens when assets are tainted: financial remedies v confiscation proceedings revisited
Sarah Wood, 5SAHFollowing on from her 2019 article 'Financial Remedies v Confiscation Proceedings: What Takes Priority?’ ([2019] Fam Law 941) in which Sarah Wood looked, in general terms, about...
Disclosure 2: This time it’s practical
Andrew Shaw, New Court ChambersSam Prout, New Court ChambersThis article aims to provide a practical guide to navigating some disclosure issues that can arise in family proceedings concerning...
Placing looked after children outside of the jurisdiction (post-Brexit)
Michael Jones, Deans Court ChambersA summary of the legal provisions that apply to placing looked after children outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales. This article contains a brief summary of...
Rings, Rolexes and Renoirs – The treatment of gifts, engagement rings, and heirlooms when a relationship comes to an end
Sarah Dodds, Senior Associate, Kingsley NapleyLiam Hurren, Trainee Solicitor, Kingsley NapleyWhen a couple separates, thoughts often turn to the valuable or sentimental items which they acquired or...
HM Treasury responds to consultation on increasing normal minimum pension age
HM Treasury  has responded to its consultation on the proposed protections framework and implementing an increase of the normal minimum pension age (NMPA) from 55 to 57 in 2028, which will...
View all articles
Authors

CH v CT [2018] EWHC 1310 (Fam)

Dec 3, 2018, 17:08 PM
Practice and procedure – Enforcement – Committal – Child arrangements order – Failure to comply – Procedural requirements of FPR 37.9(1) and PD 37A paras 1.1 and 1.2
The appeal from the committal order was allowed and the order set aside.
Slug : ch-v-ct-2018-ewhc-1310-fam
Meta Title : CH v CT [2018] EWHC 1310 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Enforcement – Committal – Child arrangements order – Failure to comply – Procedural requirements of FPR 37.9(1) and PD 37A paras 1.1 and 1.2
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 26, 2018, 07:25 AM
Article ID : 117389

(Family Division, Baker J, 25 May 2018)

Practice and procedure – Enforcement – Committal – Child arrangements order – Failure to comply – Procedural requirements of FPR 37.9(1) and PD 37A paras 1.1 and 1.2

The appeal from the committal order was allowed and the order set aside.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 1310 (Fam)

Case No: 2018/0050
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
On appeal from the Family Court at Mansfield


Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 25/05/2018

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989
AND IN THE MATTER OF E (COMMITTAL APPEAL)

CH
Applicant

- and -

CT
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Robert Glansfield (solicitor of Bhatia Best Ltd) for the Appellant
James Conlon (instructed by MKB LLP) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 1 May 2018

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.
.............................

The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the child and members of her family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: CH v CT [2018] EWHC 1310 (Fam).rtf


Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from