Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
How the care system should change - a child’s perspective
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new investigation into how children affected by the care system would like the current system to change ahead of the government’s planned...
View all articles
Authors

CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72

Nov 25, 2020, 18:43 PM
The husband’s application to set aside consent orders due to a fall in value of property was dismissed.
Slug :
Meta Title : CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
Meta Keywords : inancial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR 31F(6)
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 25, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)

Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR 31F(6) - Whether husband could apply to set aside the orders and for an adjustment of the division of assets

The husband’s application to set aside consent orders due to a fall in value of property was dismissed.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 
Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWFC 72 Case No: FD09D02020 
 
IN THE FAMILY COURT 
 
 
Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL 
 
Date: 16/11/2020 
 
Before : 
 

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Between : 
 

CB Applicant

  - and -   

EB Respondent 
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 
Frank Feehan QC (instructed by Banks Kelly Solicitors Ltd) for the Applicant Annie Ward (instructed by Baker-Law LLP) for the Respondent 
 

Hearing dates: 4-5 November 2020 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Approved Judgment 

............................. 

 
MR JUSTICE MOSTYN 
 
This judgment was delivered in private. This anonymised version of the judgment may be published.  However, in no report of the case may the identities of the parties be revealed directly or indirectly.  Breach of this restriction will amount to a contempt of court.     

Judgment: CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from