Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re W (Placement Order) [2013] EWHC 653 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:03 PM
Slug : care-proceedings-re-w-placement-order-2013-ewhc-653-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 3, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 102035

(Family Division, Peter Jackson J, 21 March 2013)

The grandmother initiated proceedings when she raised her concerns of the 16-year-old mother's ability to care for her newborn baby. During the local authority investigations allegations were discovered to have been by three children outside the immediate family, aged 10, 8 and 6, against the, then, 12-year-old uncle who lived with the grandmother.

The child, now 17 months old, had spent the first 4 months of his life at the maternal grandmother's home with the mother but had subsequently been placed with foster carers. The grandmother now sought a residence order so that she could raise the child with input from the mother. Both had been having contact with the child during proceedings.

The three children took part in ABE interviews, however, the procedure had many shortcomings including the officer asking leading questions and making no attempt to disconfirm the allegations. Despite those failings the interviews had significant evidential value and the judge concluded that the children had been subjected to inappropriate sexual experiences by the maternal uncle.

 While there were a number of positive aspects of the grandmother's ability to parent she had not always been able to provide a protective environment for children in her household. The threshold had been crossed and it was clear that a placement order was both necessary and proportionate.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from